| 
          
            
              
                
                  General Comments 
                    | 
                 
                
                  The standard of the paper was of good quality and compared  favourably with those of 
                    previous years. The questions covered the syllabus. While the  rubrics were clear and the
                    marking scheme was adequate and tion of 11.00 compared to a  raw mean score of 
                    and a standard deviation of 10.30 in the Mexhaustive. 
                    The performance of the candidates was slightly better than that  of the previous year given 
                    the raw mean score of 23 and a standard deviaay/June  2010 WASSCE.                    
                   | 
                 
                
                  | _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ | 
                 
                
                | 
             
           
             |