| 
 
 | 
            
              | 
                
                  | General Comments 
                   |  
                  | 
                    GENERAL COMMENTS  ON THE PAPER AS A WHOLE                 The standard of the paper  compared favourably with those of previous years.  The  questions were straight  forward, clearly itemized and covered wide range of the
 syllabus.   The marking scheme was flexible and  comprehensive.
 The performance of the candidates was  poor than that of the previous year with candidates population of 3, 795 had a  raw mean score of 12 and a standard deviation of 05.48 as against a raw mean  score of 28 and a standard deviation of 07.94 of the November/December 2011  WASSCE with candidates population of 3, 506. |  
                  | _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ |  |  |