The candidates were unable to:

• identify specimens A (Tilapia) and B (Clarias);
• mention the observable features of specimen A (Clarias);
• mention the common natural foods that specimen B (Clarias) feeds on in a fish pond;
• state the functions of specimen J (Cow dung) in a fish pond;
• mention the differences between specimens J (Cow dung) and K (Urea);
• give the methods of applying specimens J(Cow dung) and K(Urea)
• give the similarities between specimens L (Smoked fish) and M (Canned fish);
• state the differences in the production methods of specimens L (Smoked fish) and M (Canned fish);
• draw and label specimen R (Fishing trap); and
• state the disadvantages of using specimens Q (Scoop net), R (Fishing trap) and S (Drag Net).
• Consequent on the weaknesses observed from the candidates’ scripts, the Chief Examiners recommended as follow:
• Only competent graduates of Fisheries should be saddled with the responsibility of teaching the subject in Senior Secondary Schools;
• Fisheries should be taught as a practical oriented subject through laboratory activities, field trips,excursions etc; and
• Adequate facilities and textbooks on Fisheries should be made available to enhance the teaching – learning of Fisheries in Senior Secondary Schools.